On
the subject of whorephobia and of people refusing to acknowledge,
respond or answer to their perpetuation of it (see last blog here), I
bring you the Australian Red Cross Blood Donation group.
Blood
donation is important. I have had friends who have needed blood
donations, family members and acquaintances. According to the
Australian Red Cross only one in thirty people donate blood, but one in three people will need blood transfusions in their lifetime.
This
is sad. Really sad. Millions of people who need blood are going
without because we don't have enough people donating blood.
However,
this is not the whole story. It is not the fact that Australians are
cruel and lazy and don't give a shit about other people. On the
contrary. Almost every single person in my circle of friends (and I
have quite a large circle of friends) would donate if they could.
That's
the kicker IF they could.
For one reason or another they are unable to. Personally I think a few of these reasons or another are completely shit, discriminatory and outdated. But that's the way it is, and it doesn't look like anything is going to change any time soon.
There are four categories my friends who are unable to donate fall into.
- Living in England between 1980-1996
- Having had a tattoo within six months
- Being a gay man
- Being a sex worker
If
you take the “Am I Eligible to Donate” quiz on the Donate Blood
website, The Red Cross asks you a bunch of questions about your
history in order to determine if you are eligible or not.
Questions include are you pregnant, do you have low iron, your age group etc … And they also ask a question about “Risky Sexual Behaviour”.
Questions include are you pregnant, do you have low iron, your age group etc … And they also ask a question about “Risky Sexual Behaviour”.
I
totally get that question. It's super important and valid. STIs in
the bloodstream can be fatal, and the last thing you want to do is
expose someone to those sorts of diseases and infections... It is
absolutely imperative to sexual health and sexual practices to be
safe and protect yourself and the people you are having sex with from
infection.
You
know who knows this better than any group in the world?
Sex
Workers.
People
who fuck for cash.
Know
why? BECAUSE IT'S THEIR FUCKING LIFE AND JOB AND LIVELIHOOD!!
Sorry.
I got a bit cross there... But for fuck's sake. This is something
that irks me so much it should be shouted from every fricken rooftop
of every fricken house.
This
is their idea of “Risky Sexual Behaviour”
Now
I get that unsafe sex is risky. I get that unsafe sex with multiple
partners is risky.
I
also get that the stigma against gay men and sex workers being
“dirty” is rampant in this whorephobic, homophobic world...
BUT... it's old. It's so fucking old and tired it's bullshit and
stinks of discrimination. Because according to this you can have as much unsafe sex as you like... Unless the person you've had unsafe sex with has also had unsafe sex with a man who has sex with men.
Sure,
if you're the sort of person who goes out every weekend and has
unprotected sex with people then I get why you can't
donate. That's absolutely risky. But that isn't what they're saying at all.
Nope. It's only if you're gay, or the person you've slept with might be.
In fact, Red Cross, to single out and assume all gay
men are like this is what is called “homophobia”. Say it with me,
folks, H O M O P H O B I A.
No
no, say the Red Cross. We aren't homophobic. Gay men can donate...
They... They just can't have sex for a year beforehand.
Um...
What
about the men in long term monogamous relationships?
What
about the men who have casual sex but use protection every time?
What
about the fact that AIDS IS NOT A GAY DISEASE?
Nope.
Doesn't matter. Red Cross don't want your tainted homo blood. Eew!
Next
we come to the whorephobic discrimination against sex workers. Sex
work is lumped in with “Risky Sexual Behaviour”. Yes. Risky.
Because, you see, money makes it bad. You can go out and fuck a
hundred people in a week... But the minute money exchanges hands,
well you're probably diseased and icky. They also like to lump in
“drug use” in their whorephobia because hookers probably fuck for
drugs and drugs are bad m'kay. Conversely, there is no question in
there about getting high as fuck on E with your friends and heading
off to a nightclub and fucking a bunch of people in the toilets...
Because
that's okay. You weren't, you know, paid for it.
This
blatant whorephobia comes regardless of reams and reams of facts and
statistics that show and prove that among any demographic Australia
Wide, Sex Workers are of the lowest percentage of STI carriers in the
country.
Here
are just some examples of websites, articles, research papers etc
that prove just how wrong the Red Cross are in their discrimination:
Several
sex worker friends of mine have reached out in recent weeks to ask
the Red Cross to please explain this discrimination. On a thread on
their Facebook page last week there were a whole bunch of questions
being asked.
Why
can't I donate if I'm gay?
Why
can't I donate if I lived in the UK?
Why
are you bowing to Muslim pressure and allowing your biscuits to be
Halal?
Why
can't I donate if I'm a sex worker.
Interestingly and very tellingly every single comment got a response except the ones asked by sex workers. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.
Don't believe me? Here is the link to that thread:
Interestingly and very tellingly every single comment got a response except the ones asked by sex workers. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.
Don't believe me? Here is the link to that thread:
They
used their tired old homophobic excuses re the gay men. They
explained about the risk of mad cow disease within people who had
lived in the UK during those years. They even responded to every
single bigoted comment regarding their biscuits... But the Sex
Workers have nothing. Not a single comment, explanation or excuse.
Sex
workers have provided links to back up their statements about the
lack of STIs among them and their peers. They have asked articulate,
intelligent, well argued questions.. But nothing.
“I
would donate but now you're Muslim dogs” gets a reply but “Please
explain why you won't allow a group of people with proven safe and
healthy blood to donate?”.... Crickets....
I
too have reached out to them on Facebook and on Twitter to absolutely
no avail. They just will not respond. At all. Zip. Nada. Nothing.
This
is absolutely unacceptable.
I
call on every sex worker in Australia, every sex work ally, every
friend or partner or family member of a sex worker to get on board
and start asking the questions that demand answers.
Why,
when we are statistically proven to be of lower risk than almost any
other Australian group of people in any state or territory, are sex
workers not allowed to donate much needed blood to save lives?
Why?
I'm
not holding my breath for an answer...
(EDIT: How interesting. About twenty minutes AFTER this blog was published the Red Cross decided to reply to ONE of the comments on their Facebook thread. One. They said they had to check because they didn't know the answer... I call BULLSHIT! I call stalling because today their Twitter is blowing up. I say revoke your dumb policy now and stop blowing smoke up our goddamn arses. We usually get paid for that. We ain't letting you get away with it for free)
While we're waiting here's some examples from that thread...
(EDIT: How interesting. About twenty minutes AFTER this blog was published the Red Cross decided to reply to ONE of the comments on their Facebook thread. One. They said they had to check because they didn't know the answer... I call BULLSHIT! I call stalling because today their Twitter is blowing up. I say revoke your dumb policy now and stop blowing smoke up our goddamn arses. We usually get paid for that. We ain't letting you get away with it for free)
While we're waiting here's some examples from that thread...
The statistics you posted are about STI's that can be detected through screening easily. What about HIV? Even if you have screening weekly, it's not going to be detected immediately.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, it's easier to respond to racists. They didn't directly answer what they said anyway. The issue with gay men and higher incidence of HIV is well-established in the literature. Perhaps, the media team don't have the answer - they're not scientists. I'm sure all their clinical guidelines are based on evidence, like many health organisations.
As a child of someone who is on chemotherapy regularly and regularly receives blood, I'm glad that the risk is managed conservatively. If my mother was exposed to any infections or disease, she does not have the immunity to fight it - it's life threatening
The issue is that their clinical guidelines are outdated and offensive.
ReplyDeleteThere are some very simple ways to change their policies which would see far more donations happen, more lives saved and more stocks for emergencies and move away from old fashioned ideas that say that sex workers and gay men are inherently diseased.
The issue is that their clinical guidelines are outdated and offensive.
ReplyDeleteThere are some very simple ways to change their policies which would see far more donations happen, more lives saved and more stocks for emergencies and move away from old fashioned ideas that say that sex workers and gay men are inherently diseased.
I don't think that they believe that sex workers and gay men are 'inherently diseased' - well, at least I hope not. I think it just comes down to managing risk. I'm sure many health organisations - particularly government funded, would have to review clinical practice guidelines, at least every 2-3 years to ensure their practices reflect the latest high-quality research. I don't know the statistics, but I'm sure they could do with more donors, and would not be turn down potential donors unless there was a good reason for it.
ReplyDeleteThey actually don't. Numerous submissions have been entered and pretty much ignored. I'm doing a bunch of research on it this week to try and come up with a solution to submit to hopefully get a few changes.
ReplyDeleteThey actually don't. Numerous submissions have been entered and pretty much ignored. I'm doing a bunch of research on it this week to try and come up with a solution to submit to hopefully get a few changes.
ReplyDeleteAs a sort of aside... last time I went to a mobile donation unit, I asked about the limited slots they had for donations, and why there were so few people coming through. The nurse mentioned that mostly its because of changes to how blood use is managed in hospitals, and they just don't need as much. They need a constant flow of donations, but they weren't desperate for donors.
ReplyDeleteAccording to Stanford Medical, It's in fact the one and ONLY reason this country's women get to live 10 years more and weigh 42 lbs less than us.
ReplyDelete(Just so you know, it is not related to genetics or some secret diet and really, EVERYTHING about "HOW" they eat.)
BTW, What I said is "HOW", and not "what"...
Tap on this link to discover if this short quiz can help you unlock your true weight loss possibilities